![]() ![]() For example, in the policy process, adolescent brain immaturity has been used to make the case that teens should be considered less culpable for crimes they commit however, parallel logic has been used to argue that teens are insufficiently mature to make autonomous choices about their reproductive health. ĭespite the lack of empirical evidence, there has been increasing pressure to bring adolescent brain research to bear on adolescent health-and-welfare policy. Although such research is currently underway, many neuroscientists argue that empirical support for a causal relationship between neuromaturational processes and real-world behavior is currently lacking. Indeed, the promise of a biological explanation for often puzzling adolescent health risk behavior has captured the attention of the media, parents, policymakers, and clinicians alike. This finding has prompted interest in linking stage of neuromaturation to maturity of judgment. The frontal lobes, home to key components of the neural circuitry underlying “executive functions” such as planning, working memory, and impulse control, are among the last areas of the brain to mature they may not be fully developed until halfway through the third decade of life. In the last decade, a growing body of longitudinal neuroimaging research has demonstrated that adolescence is a period of continued brain growth and change, challenging longstanding assumptions that the brain was largely finished maturing by puberty. ![]() So, too, can this information inform policies that promote adolescent health and well-being. Furthermore, although contemporary discussions of adolescent maturity and the brain often use a deficit-based approach, there is enormous opportunity for brain science to illuminate the great strengths and potentialities of the adolescent brain. We suggest that a conceptual framework that situates brain science in the broader context of adolescent developmental research would help to facilitate research-to-policy translation. With this in mind, in this article we summarize what is known about adolescent brain development and what remains unknown, as well as what neuroscience can and cannot tell us about the adolescent brain and behavior. Nonetheless, adolescent brain development research is already shaping public policy debates about when individuals should be considered mature for policy purposes. However, empirical evidence linking neurodevelopmental processes and adolescent real-world behavior remains sparse. Public policy is struggling to keep up with burgeoning interest in cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging. This has prompted intense interest in linking neuromaturation to maturity of judgment. Articles, written by scholars from fields such as economics, consumer affairs, government, marketing, and public policy, contain new perspectives, empirical results, and research methods, as well as careful analyses of how well consumers' needs are being met as they strive to improve the quality of their lives and make efficient choices against a backdrop of sophisticated and innovative marketing activity.Longitudinal neuroimaging studies demonstrate that the adolescent brain continues to mature well into the 20s. Published quarterly, peer-reviewed articles help marketing professionals, professors, and students keep abreast of the latest government regulations and legal standards regarding marketing practices. The journal serves a growing interest group and illustrates the contribution of marketing in the legal and regulatory venue. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing publishes thoughtful articles on how marketing practice shapes and is shaped by societally important factors, such as ecology, safety, health, consumer vulnerability, deregulation, privacy, and the legal and regulatory environments. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |